Topic Sentences
· Sanders says that our present greatly reflects our past.
· People are never satisfied with what they have and end up giving up what they already have in sacrifice for something different.
· Sanders argues that a nation created from immigrants cannot adapt to new lifestyles, but instead force the land to adapt to their own culture.
· Sanders suggests (paragraph 1) that people move because they continue to search for a perfect land.
· Sanders further develops his argument (paragraph 3) against migration by suggesting it harms the physical and cultural environment of a region.
· Later Scott Russell explains that Americans believe migration will better their lives and will provide a better future.
· Sanders uses clever and deceptive word choice, as well as repetition and parallelism to effectively develop his ideas.
· Sanders argues that Americans follow attractive fantasies rather than reality because they’re taught throughout their lives that staying still is the worst possible livelihood; a standstill is what makes them deathly afraid.
· Sanders examine an essay written by British-Indian author and essayist Salman Rushdie, in his examination he points out just how absurd the idea of positive migration really is.
Thesis Statements
· Sanders dismembers Rushdie’s credibility by removing his American readers’ support and criticizing his claims with evidence from literal and historical events.
· Although America has been an innovative and progressive country, as Sanders explains, migrants’ ongoing search for a better way of life has caused them, throughout history, to settle in new places after abandoning their homelands, destroying cultures and environments of societies which they invade while losing traditions of their own.
· Sanders challenges America’s migrant culture and argues that the ugly cycle can be reversed.
· Although Rushdie makes a convincing argument, Sanders’ article disputes his theory and challenges America’s unappreciative use of land.
· Throughout his rebuttal, Sanders uses multiple strategies to discredit Rushdie, his argument, and the idea that movement is inherently good.
· Sanders uses precise diction and fear appeals to criticize America’s continuing tradition of unnecessary movement, arguing that it is responsible for damage to the environment and ourselves.